We will tell you the truth.
Even when it costs us the account.
← Home / / 6 min read / Glossary

What Is a Reconsideration Request?

A reconsideration request is a formal appeal asking Google to re-review your site after you have fixed every problem named in the Manual Actions report in Search Console.

A reconsideration request is a formal appeal asking Google to re-review your site after you have fixed every problem named in the Manual Actions report in Search Console. It is not a route out of an algorithmic ranking drop. If no manual action is listed against your property, there is nothing to reconsider and no form to submit.

Why the request matters when it applies

A manual action is a human decision, so only a human decision reverses it. Until the request is accepted, the demotion stays in place no matter how much you rewrite, rebuild or republish. This is one of the few situations in search where effort alone changes nothing.

The stakes depend on scope. A partial match affects a section of the site; a site-wide match can remove the whole domain from results. Either way, the clock runs while you prepare, and a request submitted before the fixes are complete usually comes back rejected, which costs another cycle. Getting the evidence right first is cheaper than filing twice. It also helps to watch where your rankings actually sit through the process, so you can tell a lifted action from a recovery that never arrived.

How the process actually runs

There is no separate submission portal and no email address. The whole procedure lives inside Search Console, and it only opens up once a manual action exists on the property.

  1. Confirm the action and read its scope. Open the Manual Actions report. It names the violation, tells you whether the match is site-wide or partial, and lists the affected pages. Everything you write later answers the penalty a human applied, not your own theory about the drop.
  2. Fix every issue on every affected page. Google’s instruction is unambiguous: the Request Review control is for when all issues in the report are fixed on all pages. Partial cleanups are the most common cause of rejection.
  3. Assemble the evidence. A request has to explain the exact quality issue on your site, describe the steps you took to fix it, and document the outcome of that work. Screenshots, exported link lists and a dated log of changes all count.
  4. Be honest about how it happened. Reviewers see the same patterns constantly. A request that admits buying links, or that names the agency practice that caused the problem, reads as more credible than a denial.
  5. Submit once and stop. Filing again does not move you up a queue, and there is no status bar. The outcome arrives as a message in Search Console.
  6. Read a rejection as a map. A denied request usually means something is still live. Recheck the affected pages, the redirects pointing at them, and any subdomain you forgot you owned.

Which problems are reviewable

What happenedCan you file a reconsideration request?
Manual action listed in Search ConsoleYes. This is the only trigger.
Security issue notification, such as hacked contentYes, through the Security Issues report
Traffic fell after a core updateNo. Nothing was actioned against you
Rankings dropped and no notice appearedNo. Algorithmic movement is not appealable
Pages dropped out after a site migrationNo. Diagnose the redirects and canonicals instead
Pages removed by your own noindex or robots rulesNo. Fix the rule and request indexing

The blunt version

The Manual Actions report is the entire gate. Open it. If it says no issues detected, you do not have a penalty, you have a ranking problem, and no amount of appealing will change a number that was never set by a person. Most sites that lose traffic have never had a manual action and never will.

This is where the word penalty earns its keep commercially. A sudden loss feels punitive, so penalty language gets applied to any drop, and a penalty implies an appeal, and an appeal implies a specialist. Recovery packages get sold on that chain of assumptions for sites where the Manual Actions report is empty. The work delivered might even help, but it is being sold under a false description.

Use this test before you buy anything. Ask whoever is quoting you to screenshot your Manual Actions report. Empty means the correct next step is diagnosis, usually the slower work after a core update, which is measured in quarters and has no submit button. Populated means you have a defined list of faults, a defined fix, and a defined appeal. Those two situations need different plans, different budgets and different expectations, and conflating them is the most expensive mistake in this part of the industry.

Example

Say a recruitment site loses most of its non-branded traffic across a fortnight. The panic diagnosis is a penalty, and a proposal arrives for a link cleanup and appeal. Search Console tells a different story: no manual action, no security issue, and impressions falling steadily rather than dropping off a cliff. Nobody actioned anything. The pages that lost ground are thin location templates competing with job boards that answer the query better. There is no request to file here. The fix is fewer, better pages and a reason for each one to exist, which nobody can submit for review and nobody can promise a date for.

FAQ

Can I file a reconsideration request without a manual action?

No. The request exists to have Google review your site after you fix problems identified in a manual action or a security issues notification. With neither on the property, the option is not offered in Search Console. A drop caused by ranking systems has no appeal route, because nothing was decided by a person.

How long does a review take?

Google publishes no turnaround time, and the request has no visible status. The result reaches you as a message in Search Console. Resubmitting while a review is open achieves nothing and can waste the cycle. Use the waiting period to document anything you missed, in case the answer is no.

Does a lifted manual action restore my previous rankings?

It removes the demotion, which is not the same as restoring positions. Once the action is revoked, your pages compete on whatever signals they now have, and the tactics that earned the action are usually gone. Expect the ranking floor to lift and the old peak to stay out of reach.

Related terms

  • Manual action — the human decision that a reconsideration request exists to reverse.
  • Scaled Content Abuse — one of the named policy violations most likely to put a notice in that report.
  • UTM Parameter — a measurement tag, and a reminder that most traffic mysteries are reporting faults, not penalties.

Before you pay anyone to recover a penalty, open the Manual Actions report and confirm you have one. An empty report means the invoice in front of you is for something else entirely.

Still here

Want this run on your actual traffic drop?

Send the domain and what you have been told. You get a straight answer. Including the one where we say do not hire us.